As a whole, the four variables give account of 44% of the dependent variable variance (ATLG), the linear relation among variables being significant (F (4,487) = ; p < 0.001). The most important variable in the regression equation is political self-categorization (? = -0.30; p < 0.001), followed by sex (? = 0.28; p < 0.001) and religion (? = -0.11; p < 0.05). The socioeconomic level variable has no effect on ATLG scores.
Earlier in the day training mean that homosexual guys are analyzed alot more negatively if the he is said to be in a position to manage their sexual pref-
272 = 4.94; p < 0.001). These differences are also reported by women, showing that they assess female homosexuality more negatively than male homosexuality (t241 = ; p < 0.001).
Finally, results above show that religious subjects and those who identify with the right in the political continuum have more negative attitudes toward homosexuals. Among religious subjects, those who give more importance to religion also reported a more negative attitude, though only in assessing lesbians (F 274) = 3.89; p < 0.05).
Taking you to a man are homosexual pertains to you to definitely several are not gay anymore, however, taking a great lesbian ways an excellent reformulation of the public steps
Because of the good fit of your designs, issues improve due to the fact model fit expands. Thus, the 2-factor, second-order design proposed reaches a knowledgeable fit, providing the ATLG design better self-reliance. Show support the theory that the ATLG basis construction is cutting-edge 
and you can won’t aim during the computing an over-all factor out of sexual prejudice, and this ATG and you may ATL, even if closely coordinated, allow obtaining a differentiated measure of bias into the gay guys and you may lesbians.
The fresh new factor that better demonstrates to you negative perceptions with the lesbians ‘s the thinking its exposure poses to the Old-fashioned Opinions. It thinking out-of values involves the transgression from sex jobs depending plus the curious out of ladies’ part regarding societal build. The other a couple ATL proportions consider each other lesbian’s Social Legal rights therefore the Public Sanction that comes off their legal rights and you can traditional part transgression. For this reason for it role transgression getting thus adversely examined during the „machista“ communities including the Chilean you to definitely as well as lesbians discover ideas actions less beneficial than gay boys out of each other heterosexual men and you will girls examining her or him. The scenario out-of gay boys is actually slightly additional due to the fact ATG proportions focus on other problems. Values on men homosexuality and its nature are essential.
erence (Sakalli, 2002; Verweij ainsi que al., 2008), which is, when homosexuality was an option attitudes are more negative. Perhaps, that is why this new basis Viewpoints teams also Rights as the despite the fact that try technically separable, homosexual men rights would depend or be closely related to new attributions heterosexual sufferers share with homosexuality character.
Lady sex character transgression is much more penalized than simply that homosexual people because the latter merely prevent a particular privileged updates with its solution, for this reason place themselves in one top as other social fraction group. The current presence of an enthusiastic anti-minority bias deeply rooted in far more traditional societies need to be recalled to explain prejudice levels. Lesbians are different because their self-acceptance issues the possibilities of recreating a personal design centered on men dominion. It is said a keen equalitarian status about social ladder. Abilities demonstrate that bias membership towards the homosexual the male is lowest, it transgression getting way more sociably bearable than just that of lesbians.
ATLG level features was sturdy meaning that allow it to be a indicator of your people attitude into the the 2 teams and you will, hence, the dimensions department stays pertinent. In place of most other education (Stoeber Morera, 2007) this signifies that ATLG is not a standard discrimination index (general underlying basis), it assesses a couple of teams and this, whether or not that have prominent food (indicating large relationship), it include differential issues that make them being analyzed which have special situations. Anyhow, the size and style examined remains appropriate to recognize such thoughts organizations, long lasting fact that such distinctions just weren’t experienced during the its elaboration.